Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW) Letter Rebutting NYT Article Saying Addressing Male Demand for Prostituted Women Is a "Misguided Moral Crusade"
Check out this GREAT letter by Norma Ramos of Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW) in response to the NYT article “A Misguided Moral Crusade” ~ It’s a perfect rebuttal to all of the ridiculous nonsense spread by that article that said that trying to stop DEMAND for sex trafficking (male purchasing of women for sex) was harmful to prostituted women in the sex industry! (The article also included many other points of insulting false propaganda.)
NYT article:
LINK TO LETTER BY CATW: http://www.facebook.com/CATWINTL/posts/418233864902965
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please support the cause by following us here, liking us at Facebook, subscribing at YouTube, and following all of our Twitter accounts. Thanks! AntiPornography.org Facebook Page ~~
YouTube Channels: AntiPornographyBlog ~~ AntiPornographyOrg ~~ SayNOtoProstitution ~~ ENDSexTrafficDEMAND ~~ PornAddictionHelp ~~ SayNOtoSadomasochism ~~
Twitters: @AntiPornography ~~ @ENDSexTraffic ~~ @ENDProstitution
~~ @NoSadomasochism ~~ @PornAddictHelp1 ~~ @HealthySexNLove
Post by AntiPornography.org Nonprofit Organization ~ Preventing and combating the devastating harms of pornography, prostitution, sex trafficking and sexual slavery ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTE: To comment on this post please do not click on the "Add a comment" link above. Instead, if you're viewing this post on the main blog page, please click on the "# comments" link further down and to the right, next to the time of this post. Or, if you're viewing this post on its own page, please click on "Post a comment" below the tags of this post. Also, apologies if there are any unclickable URLs in this post. They will be fixed as time allows. In the meantime, please feel free to just copy any unformatted link and then paste it into a browser address bar and then hit ENTER, in order to get to the desired page. Thanks!
NOTE: There is no more of this post at the "Read more" link below. (If anyone knows how we can make sure that that link doesn't show up in any future posts, please let us know. Thanks!) Sorry about any confusion or inconvenience, and thank you for your patience and understanding while we work on resolving this technical issue and any others at this blog that need addressing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment